PLANSPONSOR/Prudential Co-Sponsored NQDCP Research In what way(s) are you considering improving your NQDCP? Offer/enhance company match Add deferral sources Add/enhance distribution options Add/enhance investment options Add/enhance informal funding vehicle Add/enhance benefit security Add/enhance plan education/ communication Increase number of eligible employees All Respondents 30.8% 7.7% 34.6% 50.0% 0.0% 3.8% 65.4% 30.8% Annual Sales/ Revenues >$1b 37.5% 6.3% 37.5% 50.0% 0.0% 6.3% 68.8% 25.0% Annual Sales/ Revenues <$1b 20.0% 10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0% How many investment choices are offered? 1 2 - 10 All Respondents Annual Sales/ Revenues >$1b Annual Sales/ Revenues <$1b 11 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 50 7.7% 15.3% 50.5% 16.8% 3.1% Over 50 0.5% Unsure 6.1% 7.6% 15.2% 51.5% 15.9% 3.0% 0.0% 6.8% 7.8% 15.6% 48.4% 18.8% 3.1% 1.6% 4.7% How is your NQDCP recordkeeping handled? In-House All Respondents Annual Sales/ Revenues >$1b Annual Sales/ Revenues <$1b 3rd party Combination What do you find most important in an NQDCP provider?* Quality of service team Consultative in NQDCP/409A 6.2% 74.1% 19.7% 4.9 3.3 3.1% 74.6% 22.3% 4.9 3.3 12.7% 73.0% 14.3% 5.0 3.4 Do you provide a matching contribution? Yes All Respondents Annual Sales/ Revenues >$1b Annual Sales/ Revenues <$1b Online user experience 3.9 4.1 3.6 If so, what type of matching contribution? *1-6 ranking, 6 = " most important " Flat dollar amount Percent deferral match Replaces lost 401(k) match Tied to company performance Supplements 401(k) match Supplements profit sharing contribution 43.5% 1.3% 32.9% 36.8% 2.6% 56.6% 17.1% 50.0% 1.6% 30.6% 37.1% 1.6% 58.1% 17.7% 27.5% 0.0% 42.9% 35.7% 7.1% 50.0% 14.3% Ability to integrate w/401(k) provider 2.9 2.9 2.8 Participant communication/education Price 3.1 3.1 3.2 2.9 2.8 3.1