PLANSPONSOR/Prudential Co-Sponsored NQDCP Research In what way(s) are you considering improving your NQDCP? Offer/enhance company match All Respondents Add deferral sources Add/enhance distribution options Add/enhance investment options Add/enhance informal funding vehicle Add/enhance benefit security Add/enhance plan education/ communication Increase number of eligible employees 13.0% 13.0% 56.5% 47.8% 13.0% 13.0% 60.9% 21.7% Annual Sales/ Revenues >$1b 12.5% 12.5% 62.5% 37.5% 12.5% 12.5% 56.3% 12.5% Annual Sales/ Revenues <$1b 14.3% 14.3% 42.9% 71.4% 14.3% 14.3% 71.4% 42.9% How many investment choices are offered? 1 2 - 10 All Respondents Annual Sales/ Revenues >$1b Annual Sales/ Revenues <$1b 6.7% 6.6% 7.0% 11 - 20 21 - 30 31 - 50 Over 50 Unsure 19.7% 43.0% 18.1% 5.2% 1.0% 6.2% 18.0% 43.4% 20.5% 5.7% 1.6% 22.5% 42.3% 14.1% 4.2% 0.0% How is your NQDCP recordkeeping handled? In-House All Respondents Annual Sales/ Revenues >$1b Annual Sales/ Revenues <$1b 3rd party Combination What do you find most important in an NQDCP provider?* Quality of service team Consultative in NQDCP/409A 5.7% 77.7% 16.6% 4.9 3.7 1.6% 82.8% 15.6% 4.9 3.7 12.7% 69.0% 18.3% 5.0 3.7 Do you provide a matching contribution? Yes All Respondents Annual Sales/ Revenues >$1b Annual Sales/ Revenues <$1b Online user experience 3.8 4.0 3.3 If so, what type of matching contribution? *1-6 ranking, 6= " most important " Flat dollar amount Percent deferral match Replaces lost 401(k) match Tied to company performance Supplements 401(k) match Supplements profit sharing contribution 48.7% 2.7% 24.3% 44.6% 4.1% 55.4% 21.6% 50.5% 1.8% 23.2% 46.4% 5.4% 58.9% 23.2% 43.9% 5.6% 27.8% 38.9% 0.0% 44.4% 16.7% Ability to integrate w/401(k) provider 2.6 2.7 2.5 Participant communication/education Price 3.1 3.0 3.3 2.9 2.8 3.1 4.1% 9.9%